Monday, January 24, 2011

High Altitude Adaptation

       Athletes are known for trying to increase their capacity to process oxygen. Increased blood oxygen levels have many benefits for those wishing to increase their aerobic capacity and endurance during exercise, and small increases in blood oxygen capacity can be achieved by training at high altitudes where oxygen levels are lower. While athletes are focussing on short time frames of one individual, several scientists have begun asking what the effects of living at high altitudes are for populations on an evolutionary time scale. Peoples living at greater than 8,000 feet above sea level have clearly adapted to their environment, as non-natives that attempt to live at such high altitudes often suffer from acute hypoxia, which is absent in natives.
      One well-studied and understood example of this type of adaptation occurs in native South Americans living on the Andean Plateau. Compared to lowlanders, they breathe at the same rate, have a similar red blood cell count and do not have any novel hemoglobin variants. However, each red blood cell in the body holds a greater amount of total hemoglobin. This allows for the transport of more gasses throughout the body without increasing blood viscosity.  This is in contrast to Tibetans, who have been found to have unchanged hemoglobin levels, but simply take more breaths during a given time, which increases the rate of gas exchange in the lungs. They have also been found to have abnormally high levels of nitrous oxide int heir blood, which is a gas synthesized in the body that triggers vasodialation. This increases blood flow to peripheral tissues and increase the rate of gas exchange. A third population located in the highlands of Ethiopia has been investigated as well, but no change in any of the variables already mentioned were found. This suggests that there are more subtle or complex factors regulating gas exchange, and may open up an exciting new line of investigation. 






Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Working the night shift.

      While artificial light sources are almost universally considered a boon to human society, a substantial amount of research indicates that altering the natural pattern of light and dark cycles can be damaging both physiologically and cognitively.
      Circadian rhythms are 24-hour cycles generated by internal molecular clocks found in nearly all organisms ranging from prokaryotes to primates. The evolutionary rationale behind circadian clocks is that organisms benefit from being able to predict changes in light and temperature fluctuations prior to their occurrence. For example, a nocturnal mammal may find a safe hiding place slightly before sunrise in order to avoid being exposed to predators. These behavioral changes are possible due to outputs from the cellular clocks to the tissue level, which result in endocrine signals that produce behavioral results. Historically, all animals (including humans) were exposed to constant light/dark cycles that only underwent gradual changes with the seasons. Current technology, however, has drastically changed the regularity and ratio of our light/dark cycle. A substantial amount of research suggests that these changes are not without consequence.
          Individuals who work night shifts have been shown to have decreased life expectancies.  This is in part due to increased risk of certain cancers, as well as increased of work-related deaths due to decreased cognitive ability in industrial settings. This phenomenon has also been replicated in controlled animal studies, where mice that were forced to shift their circadian phase showed decreased cognitive ability, and had a tendency to gain weight. Taken together, these data suggest that being exposed to artificial light and altered sleep schedules can have lasting negative effects on human health.



http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/02/110226214132.htm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/mar/17/night-shifts-health
http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/apr102007/890.pdf